32 Comments
User's avatar
Solfeggio Frequencies's avatar

Discover our different music re-tuning software here: https://solfeggiofrequencies.org/apps

Expand full comment
M Le Baron's avatar

I am a classically trained pianist and singer. I played Rachmaninov on a late 1800’s Boësendorfer concert grand which had the old tuning. As I played. I realized tears were streaming down my face. I can only describe the sound as angelic. I will never forget that. All my keyboards are now custom tuned. The rush of endorphins can be overwhelming!

Thank you. Your post was phenomenal! I too time travel. What a gift.

Expand full comment
Reut Shalev's avatar

I know exactly what you're talking about and felt your every word in my body as truth.

When I work on clients with energy healing and they have a major shift - this is exactly the feeling you captured here so beautifully.

This is why I say: 440 close the door, while harmonic, natural frequencies open it.

Thank you for sharing this🙏

Expand full comment
M Le Baron's avatar

Thank you for the amazing response. I’m a true believer. I use vocals and music to control severe chronic pain. Even when you are using your body as an instrument (singing), there are frequencies my body responds to. On those tones, the vibrato is insane, and I feel it down to my toes. My dogs respond as well. Nature is wondrous, indeed.

Expand full comment
Reut Shalev's avatar

The body doesn't lie. We learn through experience. And once you experience you believe. And for your body it's a knowing.

Pain tells a deeper story. Symptoms are communication messages from our body (subconscious), when you give the body the frequency, vibration it needs - you're restoring connection and bringing that part back to safety and balance and potential integration.

Amazing work ♥️

Expand full comment
M Le Baron's avatar

What a lovely way to describe it.

Expand full comment
DayDawnBreaking's avatar

I do love classical music tuned to 432 hz. It’s very restful and makes me feel good. Thanks for your information. This is not the first time I have heard of this.

Expand full comment
Synesis Aletheia's avatar

@Timothy Burchett . This is what I was talking about a few days ago. This change has been significantly negative for humanity.

Expand full comment
Robert A M Ross's avatar

The “time-travel” experience is absolutely true! My most vivid experience of this came from revisiting a recording of Rachmaninov’s •The Bells• in which I sang as a freshman in college—listening to it took me directly back to age 18 and the wonder of being involved in such a massive musical effort.

Expand full comment
Dr.Don Hall's avatar

Absolutely correct. Disruptive Neuro Science.

Expand full comment
Reut Shalev's avatar

Glad you could see it ♥️

Expand full comment
VedicSoul's avatar

Good read..

Thank you 🙏

Expand full comment
Naūno's avatar

I get the point, but aren't AI generated images an equivalent to 440hz? Aren't they as offensive to the deep sensitivity as that frequency? I can speak for myself. AI images trigger a sense of "almost"... I don't say it's not art, cause anyone who studies art history knows that art has no closed definition nowadays, and I don't look at it in a romantic or moralistic way... it just doesn't actually click, you know? Perhaps you could not use AI imagery to illustrate texts that seem to come from an honest, authentic place. But I'm nobody to ask that, I'm just expressing a feeling

Expand full comment
Reut Shalev's avatar

I appreciate your comment.

I'm also sensitive to it, (and in general) but from my art therapist prespective, I feel that sometimes the message through the picture is strong enough and obviously human led to deflect the "almost" feeling you get when you just let the AI generate whatever it wants.

I wanted to say that 440 puts us in a closed door, closed room..and harmonious frequencies allows connection and healing, an open door, a path.

The circle as the sun representative is also a mandala so represents the "self" as Jung perceived it and explored it and brought from it most of what we know about the psyche today.

Since I'm not a digital artist there would be no other way for me to visually create my message, emphasis on my message.

That being said, I see you, I hear you and I totally get it.

🙏

Expand full comment
John1200's avatar

Woo

Expand full comment
sylvia malkah calderón couriel's avatar

🎼 Gracias 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Working with Sound Is My Pathy!!!!

Sorry, At this moment I Have no income....

Thank you Again .....

Expand full comment
Adrienne's avatar

432 is not a solfeggio frequency though. (I think it is a harmonic of the Schumann resonance?)

You do hit a few Solfeggio frequencies along the way if you tune A to 444 though. I think that lands C at 528.

Expand full comment
Solfeggio Frequencies's avatar

Right! you are correct, 432 is NOT a Solfeggio, but an anchor frequency many people gravitate towards because of how nice it sounds. Some composers did promote it in the past. Here is a good article that explains it: https://news.solfeggiofrequencies.org/p/the-secret-relationship-between-energy

Expand full comment
Alli's avatar

I postulate that 432 may be another way to keep us in this realm. If we resonate with the frequency of the Earth then that actually may bind us here which is different than the idea that we’re actually in harmony with Earth. Just something I’ve considered since we pretty much have to reexamine everything at this point.

Expand full comment
Reut Shalev's avatar

I'm on board with examining everything. My point here isn't around 432, but about us taking back control over our music and our frequency.

I ask my body every single time which frequency it needs, like I ask about anything else as a form of creating a safe environment and communication with my body.

So I think the main issue is that we were forced one way. Single frequency. And we are ever changing. And we are taking back the autonomy over our body and our being in different ways, one of them is returning the music.

Right now I'm favoring 528 but that'll change. Because I change. We're retuning and attuning♥️

Expand full comment
Thomas Logan's avatar

Not enough information to justify spending on a subscription to listen to music I bought and paid for.

Nowadays anyone can promise intangible but unprovable benefits. Why have only three musicians including Stephen Halpern ever recorded their music tuned to 432hz?

If it had such an amazing benefit the top musicians would be all over this. Promising inner peace and calmness? IMO, Syquel is just another money grab. The Hertz app is crippled to force users to upgrade to a paid version.

Expand full comment
Solfeggio Frequencies's avatar

Thomas, No one is forcing you to do anything. If you are happy with 440 Hz - continue to listen to your music at that tuning.

A good number of people discovered that tuning their music to other frequencies such as 432 Hz and Solfeggio frequencies makes the music sound and feel better to them. That's why people subscribe - for the option to choose what frequency each and every song is played at = so that they have full control over the music they consume!

Just like you can choose what music you listen to, you can now choose what frequency it is tuned to. What you do with this knowledge is 100% your choice.

As to your consensus remark - just because something becomes a "standard" doesn't make it right, certainly not for everyone.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jun 13
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Doc Smith’s HIFNE & JP's avatar

100%

Expand full comment
Marcella Friel's avatar

I’m interested in this topic but this “writing” is straight out of ChatGPT, the 440 of language. Hurts my brain too much to read the rest.

Expand full comment
Alex Hessler's avatar

This could use some fact-checking. Music isn't so simple. Even A over C in modern tuning isn't just 440. This covers the complexity of this topic well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt3EAPDn-Ug

Expand full comment
Solfeggio Frequencies's avatar

There are literally hundreds of videos like this on YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook etc. They tend to show a very limited angle and be focused around one person's opinion about the topic.

We believe the best thing for any of us to do is simply try for yourself and then have an educated, first person experience you can then share with the world!

Expand full comment
dave's avatar

Why don’t you leave it at 440 and redefine the second? Everything is arbitrary.

Expand full comment
Dr Kay's avatar

Feels like this was, unfortunately, written by A.I. The cadence, the flow, the repeating sentence structure "but it wasn't X, it was Y" Synthetic....or 100% organic human?

Expand full comment
Reut Shalev's avatar

Hi! I'm the human. I agree it's hard to tell truth from fiction these days but I'm 100% real.

Have a wonderful day♥️

Expand full comment
Dr Kay's avatar

Thanks for that but....it wasn't my question. The question was about the use of A.I . to write this article, not are YOU human

Expand full comment